John: Popularity, Rank and History

By the Baby Name Data Editorial Team · Last updated: October 2026

John has been recorded in U.S. Social Security Administration baby name data in 145 of the 145 years covered by this site, first appearing in 1880 and most recently in 2024. Across that whole span, parents recorded 5,196,210 births with this name, split between 21,740 girls and 5,174,470 boys. Because the larger side of that split is boys, this page follows the boys ranking table as its main story, while still reporting the combined total above so the name can be compared fairly with every other name in the top 100 all-time list. Every figure here is a direct count from the SSA file: there are no estimates, no projections, and no names added from any other source.

The single biggest year for John was 1947, when 88,321 boys received the name and it reached rank 3 nationally. A name's peak year matters because it shows the moment when the name competed most successfully against every other name chosen that year. Rank and count tell slightly different stories: the count can rise simply because more babies were born overall, while the rank and the share of births strip out that effect. In 1947, John accounted for 4.83% of all recorded boys births, which is the cleanest measure of how dominant it was at its height compared with peaks reached in smaller or larger birth years.

John by decade

The decade table below is where the long story of John becomes easiest to read. A decade total smooths out single-year spikes and shows whether a name was a brief fashion or a durable fixture. Names that hold high decade totals for forty or fifty years behave very differently from names that post one enormous decade and then fade, and John can be placed on that spectrum directly from these ten-year sums and the best rank it managed inside each decade.

In the 1880s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 1 and recording 89,949 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1890s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 1 and recording 80,664 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1900s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 1 and recording 84,590 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1910s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 1 and recording 376,312 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1920s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 1 and recording 564,051 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1930s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 3 and recording 487,946 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1940s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 3 and recording 711,600 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1950s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 3 and recording 797,917 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file.

In the 1960s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 2 and recording 713,374 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1970s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 4 and recording 402,636 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1980s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 8 and recording 321,161 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1990s, John was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 10 and recording 240,147 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. During the 2000s, John stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 14 and 161,083 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 2010s, John stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 26 and 102,763 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 2020s, John stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 21 and 40,277 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table.

Rank history in selected years

This table samples the record at intervals so the shape of the history is visible at a glance: the birth count, the national rank among boys, and the share of all boys births for that year. Shares are included deliberately. In the 1880 file the recorded birth population is far smaller than in the peak birth years of the twentieth century, so a modest count in 1880 can represent a larger share, and a larger rank, than the same count would earn today. Reading count, rank, and share together is the method this site recommends on every page, and it is explained in full on the methodology page linked in the footer.

Recent years and the other side of the table

Between 2010 and 2024 the annual count moved from 11,567 to 8,047, a change of -30.4 percent, which is the clearest short-hand for where John stands right now: losing ground in the most recent data. In 2000, for comparison, John recorded 20,113 births for boys, and in 2010 it recorded 11,567. Placing 2024 between those two reference points shows whether the latest figure is part of a steady climb, a steady slide, or a plateau after earlier movement. None of these short windows should be read on their own: a name recovering from a low base can post large percentage gains while still ranking modestly, and a name easing down from a peak can lose percentage points while remaining one of the most used names in the country.

John also appears on the girls side of the file, with 21,740 recorded births between 1880 and 2024. That secondary use is much smaller than the 5,174,470 births recorded for boys, and SSA ranks each sex separately, so the rank history above follows the boys table only. Counting both sides together, John totals 5,196,210 recorded births, which is the figure that places it at number 2 on this site's all-time combined list. Readers comparing names should keep the two sides separate, because a rank earned among boys and a rank earned among girls describe two different fields of competing names in the same year.

To explore further, compare John with the full rankings for its peak year (1947) through the years index, browse the decade rankings, or return to the complete A–Z list of name pages. The state pages show how the biggest states ranked names in 2024, which often differs from the national order in the smaller details even when the same few names lead both tables.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies named John were born in 2024?
In 2024 the SSA recorded 8,047 boys named John, ranked 21 among boys that year.

When was John most popular?
John peaked in 1947 with 88,321 births for boys, reaching rank 3 that year in SSA records.

How many people named John appear in SSA records since 1880?
SSA records show 5,196,210 births named John from 1880 through 2024, counting both sexes together.

Disclaimer: Baby Name Data publishes statistics drawn from U.S. Social Security Administration baby name records. Figures are counts of Social Security card applications by year of birth and are shown for general information only. Counts below five in any year, sex, or state are not released by the SSA and are not estimated here. Nothing on this page is advice about what to name a child.

Data: U.S. Social Security Administration baby name records, 1880–2024, retrieved October 2026. Source: ssa.gov/oact/babynames/